berenisEen adviesgroep van de Zwitserse Federal Office of Environment heeft een rapport uitgebracht waarin uitgebreid de onderzoeksresultaten worden geevalueerd van de NTP en het Ramazzini 'cell phone/animal cancer' studies.

Deze BERENIS groep roept op om: voorzichtig te zijn met het gebruik van draadloze apparatuur. 

De adviezen van BERENIS zijn te vinden in de Newsletter van November 2018:

Enkele quotes uit de conclusie:

-  The NTP and Ramazzini studies are most comprehensive animal studies with regard to cancer and exposure to mobile phone and base station signals that have been conducted to date. The scientific quality and standard of laboratory techniques are high, especially in the NTP study.

-  The results of these two animal studies are of great scientific relevance and importance for health policy because according to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), positive results from animal studies with lifetime exposure are very important with regard to the classification of cancer risk of an agent, together with data from epidemiological and mechanistic studies.

- Based on the observed evidence regarding a correlation between mobile phone use and gliomas as well as acoustic neuroma, the latter data led to the IARC classification of mobile phone radiation as ‘possibly carcinogenic’ (group 2B) in 2011.

( The IARC classifies the risk that an agent or environmental toxin causes cancer in humans into five groups, namely ‘probably not carcinogenic’ (group 4), ‘not classifiable’ (3), ‘possibly carcinogenic’ (2B), ‘probably carcinogenic’ (2A) or ‘carcinogenic’ (1).)

- Despite the methodological differences, both new animal studies showed relatively consistent results in schwannomas and gliomas, as well as a dose-dependent trend to an increase in the carcinogenicity of these tumors.

- In summary, BERENIS supports a precautionary approach for regulating RF EMF based on the findings and their evaluation. A full risk assessment analysis taking into account all available studies (animal studies and epidemiological studies) is necessary to assess whether the current standards should be changed.